Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Vet Res ; 10: 252, 2014 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25310968

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A variety of analgesic agents are available, and which one can be used in dogs and cats is a highly controversial issue, existing however a fear in the use of opiates due to possible adverse effects that these drugs can cause. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect provided by the administration of tramadol or pethidine on early postoperative pain of cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy in a double-blind prospective study. Fourty-two animals were randomly assigned into three groups. Pet received pethidine (6 mg/kg), Tra 2 received tramadol (2 mg/kg) and Tra 4 received tramadol (4 mg/kg); all intramuscularly and associated with acepromazine (0.1 mg/kg). The efficacy of each analgesic regimen was evaluated prior to surgery (baseline - TBL), during surgery and 1, 3 and 6 hours after extubation with subjective pain scale, physiologic parameters, serum concentrations of glucose, cortisol and IL-6. RESULTS: Changes in cardiovascular system were not clinically relevant. There were no significant differences in pain scores (P > 0.05) during the study, although the number of rescue analgesia was significantly higher (P < 0.05) at Pet group (5/14) than Tra 4 group (0/14), whereas in Tra 2, two animals (2/14) required additional analgesia. The serum cortisol values of Pet group were significantly higher at T1h T3h (P < 0.05) and T6h (P < 0.01) when compared to baseline (induction), also it was noticed a significant difference among the groups at T6h (Pet values were higher than Tra 2 and Tra 4; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tramadol provided adequate analgesia and it was more effective than pethidine to at least six hours for the studied animals. At the higher dose (4 mg/kg) tramadol is probably more effective, since rescue analgesia was not necessary. No significant changes were observed physiological parameter that could contraindicate the use of these opioid in described doses, for the feline species.


Assuntos
Gatos , Histerectomia/veterinária , Meperidina/farmacologia , Ovariectomia/veterinária , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Tramadol/farmacologia , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Meperidina/administração & dosagem , Tramadol/administração & dosagem
2.
BMC Vet Res ; 10: 194, 2014 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25193623

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute postsurgical pain is of great interest due to potential risk of becoming chronic if not treated properly, worsening patient's recovery and quality of life. Twenty-eight dogs with ruptured cruciate ligaments were divided into three groups that received intramuscular injections of 4 mg/kg of tramadol (TRA), 0.5 mg/kg of methadone (MET0.5), or 0.7 mg/kg of methadone (MET0.7). Physiological parameters (heart and respiratory rates and blood pressure) were evaluated at specified times: baseline (TBL), 1 (T1), 2 (T2), 4 (T4), 6 (T6), and 24 (T24) hours after premedication. Pain scores were described by visual analogue scale (VAS), modified Glasgow Composite, and Colorado University Acute Pain scales. Blood samples for measurement of interleukin (IL)-6 were collected at TBL, T1, T6, and T24. This was a prospective, randomised investigation to evaluate the efficacy of tramadol and methadone as premedications in dogs undergoing osteotomies. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to age, weight, gender, surgery time, and time to extubation. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure values were maintained within acceptable ranges, and a reduction was observed at T2 in MET0.5 and MET0.7 compared with TBL. Increases in VAS scores were observed in TRA at T4 compared with TBL, T1, and T24 and between T1 and T6 (p < 0.001). In MET0.5, there was significant increase in VAS score at T4 compared with T1 (p < 0.001). TRA and MET0.5 showed significantly higher mean ± SD VAS scores (3.4 ± 2.5 and 2.5 ± 2.6, respectively) than MET0.7 (1.1 ± 1.5) at T4 (p < 0.001). TRA showed greater demand of rescue analgesia (four animals in T4 and two in T6) (p < 0.037). There were no statistically significant differences in sedation scores, Colorado Scale scores, or interleukin levels between groups and time points. CONCLUSIONS: Methadone given as premedication in doses of 0.7 mg/kg was better at controlling pain compared with lower doses and tramadol. However, dosage increases, administered as rescue analgesia, promoted adequate pain control even in tramadol group. Influence of these analgesics on IL-6 release could not be demonstrated, but significant levels were not found.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Cães/cirurgia , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Metadona/farmacologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/veterinária , Tramadol/farmacologia , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Animais , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Cães/lesões , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Metadona/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor/veterinária , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ruptura/cirurgia , Tramadol/administração & dosagem
3.
J Feline Med Surg ; 13(10): 738-43, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21873092

RESUMO

Sixteen cats were used to compare the cardiovascular and anesthetic effects of remifentanil (REMI) or alfentanil (ALF) in propofol-anesthetized cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. After premedication with acepromazine, anesthesia was induced and maintained with a constant rate infusion of propofol (0.3 mg/kg/min). REMI or ALF infusions were administered simultaneously with propofol. Heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), pulse oximetry (SpO(2)), rectal temperature (RT), and response to surgical stimulation were recorded at predefined time points during anesthesia. Data [mean±standard deviation (SD)] were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures followed by a Dunnett's test and Student t-test (P<0.05). SAP was significantly lower in ALF group than in REMI group. Extubation time was significantly shorter in REMI than in ALF group. Overall infusion rate of REMI and ALF was 0.24±0.05 µg/kg/min and 0.97±0.22 µg/kg/min, respectively. The combination of propofol and REMI or ALF provided satisfactory anesthesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.


Assuntos
Alfentanil/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Intravenosa/veterinária , Histerectomia/veterinária , Ovariectomia/veterinária , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Animais , Gatos , Feminino , Monitorização Fisiológica/veterinária , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Remifentanil
4.
Am J Vet Res ; 71(9): 1019-26, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20807140

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesic effects of tramadol, codeine, and ketoprofen administered alone and in combination and their effects on concentrations of blood glucose, serum cortisol, and serum interleukin (IL)-6 in dogs undergoing maxillectomy or mandibulectomy. ANIMALS: 42 dogs with oral neoplasms. PROCEDURES: 30 minutes before the end of surgery, dogs received SC injections of tramadol (2 mg/kg), codeine (2 mg/kg), ketoprofen (2 mg/kg), tramadol+ketoprofen, or codeine+ketoprofen (at the aforementioned dosages). Physiologic variables, analgesia, and sedation were measured before (baseline) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 24 hours after surgery. Blood glucose, serum cortisol, and serum IL-6 concentrations were measured 1, 3, 5, and 24 hours after administration of analgesics. RESULTS: All treatments provided adequate postoperative analgesia. Significant increases in mean+/-SD blood glucose concentrations were detected in dogs receiving tramadol (96+/-14 mg/dL), codeine (120+/-66 mg/dL and 96+/-21 mg/dL), ketoprofen (105+/-22 mg/dL), and codeine+ketoprofen (104+/-16 mg/dL) at 5, 1 and 3, 5, and 3 hours after analgesic administration, respectively, compared with preoperative (baseline) values. There were no significant changes in physiologic variables, serum IL-6 concentrations, or serum cortisol concentrations. Dogs administered codeine+ketoprofen had light but significant sedation at 4, 5, and 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Opioids alone or in combination with an NSAID promoted analgesia without adverse effects during the 24-hour postoperative period in dogs undergoing maxillectomy or mandibulectomy for removal of oral neoplasms.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Glicemia/metabolismo , Codeína/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Cão/cirurgia , Hidrocortisona/sangue , Cetoprofeno/uso terapêutico , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Neoplasias Mandibulares/veterinária , Maxila/cirurgia , Neoplasias Maxilares/veterinária , Dor Pós-Operatória/veterinária , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Animais , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Cães , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Masculino , Doenças Mandibulares/cirurgia , Doenças Mandibulares/veterinária , Neoplasias Mandibulares/cirurgia , Doenças Maxilares/cirurgia , Doenças Maxilares/veterinária , Neoplasias Maxilares/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...